Cases 41 - 50 of 97
WHITAKER v. SCI-FAYETTE et al
as 2:2022cv00038
Plaintiff:
DAMION D. WHITAKER
Defendant:
SCI-FAYETTE, ERIC ARMEL, RHONDA HOUSE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
JOHNSON v. WETZEL et al
as 2:2022cv00382
Plaintiff:
THOMAS JOHNSON
Defendant:
JOHN WETZEL, BERNADETTE MASON, CHARLES STETLLER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
INGRAM v. RUDZIENSKI et al
as 2:2022cv00042
Plaintiff:
KAI D. INGRAM
Defendant:
B. RUDZIENSKI, MICHAEL J. ZAKEN, S. DAVIS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
BREWER v. SHEA et al
as 2:2022cv00205
Plaintiff:
DONTE BREWER
Defendant:
K. SHEA, LIEUTENANT ROHAL, SERGEANT PIERCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
LIZ v. PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2022cv00396
Plaintiff:
RAMON M. LIZ
Defendant:
PENNSYLVANIA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, D. VARNER, KERI MOORE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CEASAR v. VARNER et al
as 1:2021cv00323
Plaintiff:
DIMITRIC CEASAR
Defendant:
D. VARNER, KERRI MOORE, T. BIEL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Krushin v. Wolff et al
as 4:2021cv01682
Plaintiff:
Raymond Krushin
Defendant:
Tom Wolff, Joshua Shapiro, John Wetzel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company v. Action Caulking & Sealants, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05977
Plaintiff:
State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Action Caulking & Sealants, Inc., Colfax Corp., Orlando D. Varner and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
THOMAS v. CLARK et al
as 1:2021cv00230
Plaintiff:
GREGORY THOMAS
Defendant:
MICHAEL CLARK, PATRICIA THOMPSON, D. VARNER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Betts v. Varner et al
as 1:2021cv01309
Plaintiff:
Tasai Betts
Defendant:
D. Varner, Kevin Kauffman, J. McCloskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
