Cases 41 - 50 of 55
Bryan Ransom v. A. Scribner, et al
as 11-16773
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BRYAN EDWIN RANSOM
Defendant - Appellee:
A. K. SCRIBNER, GRAVES, RIDDLE and others
Sheppard v. Astrue
as 10-6172
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARL D. SHEPPARD
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner Social Security Administration
Dodson v. Bourland et al
as 3:2010cv01474
Plaintiff:
Tyun S Dodson
Defendant:
M E Bourland, G J Janda, T Ochoa and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Winters v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 10-15667
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of CDCR, DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden, L. WATSON and others
Robert Winters v. USDCFR
as 10-70823
:
In re: ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Petitioner:
ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Respondent:
USDC, FRESNO
Real Party In Interest:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of CDCR, DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden, L. WATSON and others
Bruner-McMahon et al v. Sedgwick, County of et al
as 6:2010cv01064
Plaintiff:
Tera M. Bruner-McMahon and Jesse A. Bruner
Defendant:
Sedgwick, County of, Sedgwick County Sheriff's Department, Sedgwick County Board of Commissioners and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Dept of Corrections
as 1:2004cv05742
Plaintiff:
Charles Jones
Defendant:
R J Gonzales , J Mendoza , A. K. Scribner and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robert Winters v. Susan Hubbard, et al
as 09-16947
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT ANTHONY WINTERS
Defendant - Appellee:
SUSAN HUBBARD, Director of CDCR, DARRELL G. ADAMS, Warden, Warden, L. WATSON and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 09-15760
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant - Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Sheppard v. Astrue
as 5:2009cv00390
Plaintiff:
Carl D Sheppard
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
