Cases 41 - 50 of 67
J.R. v. San Jose D.A.
as 3:2018cv00029
Plaintiff:
J.R.
Defendant:
San Jose D.A.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Uballe v. Ector County Law Enforcement Center Staff, et al
as 7:2017cv00144
Defendant:
Jailer Angie Abalos, Lt. J. Abalos, LVN Beverly Alexander and others
Plaintiff:
Robert David Uballe
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Carroll et al
as 6:2017cv00059
Defendant:
D.A. Murff Bledsoe, Judge Joe Carroll, Sheriff Eddy Lange and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Price v. Cummings et al
as 6:2017cv00060
Defendant:
D.A. Dusty Boyd, Sheriff Johnny Burks, Judge Bobby L. Cummings and others
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Price
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Braden v. State of Texas et al
as 4:2017cv00518
Plaintiff:
Travien Braden
Defendant:
State of Texas, Harris County D.A. Court #337, Mazabra Blake and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Tennyson v. Machicek et al
as 6:2016cv01170
Plaintiff:
Gregory Dewayne Tennyson
Defendant:
Lucas Machicek, Jack Skeen, Matt Bingham and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Holton v. Wilson et al
as 4:2016cv00624
Plaintiff:
Mark V Holton
Defendant:
Sharon Wilson, Assistant Trial D.A., Assistant Appellate D.A. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Roberts, Jr. v. Rodgers et al
as 4:2016cv01026
Plaintiff:
Joseph D. Roberts, Jr.
Defendant:
J.P. Rodgers, D. Ortega, D.A. Solis and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Lyons v. Senior Arresting Officer et al
as 5:2015cv00183
Plaintiff:
Smitty James Lyons
Defendant:
Senior Arresting Officer, D.A. Lubbock County Court, Jeff Nicholson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Phillips v. D.A. Humphries and Associates, LLC et al
as 4:2015cv00121
Plaintiff:
Harold Phillips
Defendant:
D.A. Humphries and Associates, LLC and National Credit Adjusters, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
