Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Johnson v. Gomez et al
as 3:2022cv00860
Plaintiff:
Maurice S. Johnson
Defendant:
David Gomez, Graves, Stateville Correctional Center and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Jeffreys, et al
as 1:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Ryan W. Campbell
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez, C/O Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Richter v. David Gomez
as 22-1718
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID GOMEZ, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center
Sergio David Gomez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al.
as 5:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Sergio David Gomez
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Brown v. Truitt
as 1:2022cv01805
Petitioner:
Kiar Brown
Respondent:
C. Truitt and David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Gamez v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01426
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez and . Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Morris v. Placement Officer et al
as 1:2022cv01375
Plaintiff:
Robert E Morris
Defendant:
John/Jane Doe Placement Officer, John/Jane Doe Sanitation Officer, Keenan Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Mantez Duncan
Defendant:
David Gomez, Anna McBee, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Gamez v. Jeffreys et al
as 1:2022cv01079
Plaintiff:
Gabriel Gamez
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez and . Fox
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc. et al
as 1:2022cv01297
Plaintiff:
Romeo Jackson
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources, Inc., Warden David Gomez, Warden Kenneth Osborn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
