Cases 41 - 50 of 229
Anderson v. Murphy et al
as 1:2022cv03570
Plaintiff:
Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
Steven T Murphy, Quentin Tanner, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Unknown v. Unknown
as 1:2022cv03750
Plaintiff:
Leroy Anderson
Defendant:
Steven T Murphy, Quentin Tanner, David Gomez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lee v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv03400
Plaintiff:
Timothy B Lee
Defendant:
David Gomez, Young, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rakin v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv03291
Plaintiff:
Farid Rakin
Defendant:
David Gomez, Helen Bruckner, Wexford Health Source, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
William Richter v. David Gomez
as 22-1718
Petitioner / Appellant:
WILLIAM RICHTER
Respondent / Appellee:
DAVID GOMEZ, Warden, Stateville Correctional Center
Sergio David Gomez v. Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC et al.
as 5:2022cv00657
Plaintiff:
Sergio David Gomez
Defendant:
Mercedes-Benz USA, LLC and Does 1 through 50, inclusive
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal -- Other Contract
Brown v. Truitt
as 1:2022cv01805
Petitioner:
Kiar Brown
Respondent:
C. Truitt and David Gomez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
West v. Young et al
as 1:2022cv01275
Plaintiff:
Kentes West
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez, Lt. Keenan Young and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Duncan v. Gomez et al
as 1:2022cv01339
Plaintiff:
Mantez Duncan
Defendant:
David Gomez, Anna McBee, Rob Jeffreys and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Campbell v. Jeffreys, et al
as 1:2022cv02198
Plaintiff:
Ryan W. Campbell
Defendant:
Rob Jeffreys, David Gomez, C/O Simon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
