Cases 41 - 50 of 56
Gomez v. Astrue
as 4:2011cv00705
Plaintiff:
Cynthia Diann Gomez
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Barnes et al v. TA Operating LLC
as 2:2011cv02157
Plaintiff:
Dianne Barnes and Carl Barnes
Defendant:
TA Operating LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Marben v. Progressive Group Of Insurance Companies et al
as 4:2011cv00666
Plaintiff:
Dianne Cornell Marben
Defendant:
Progressive Group Of Insurance Companies, Progressive Advanced Insurance Company and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Tipton v. Benson, City of et al
as 4:2011cv00508
Plaintiff:
Dianne Tipton
Defendant:
Benson, City of, Mark Fenn, Carrie Fenn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Barker v. Phoenix, City of et al
as 2:2011cv01543
Plaintiff:
Dianne Barker
Defendant:
Phoenix, City of , Philip Gordon, 21st Century Insurance Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Fugozzotto et al v. Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated et al
as 2:2010cv02304
Plaintiff:
Samuel D Fugozzotto , Mary E Fugozzotto , Vera Marelli and others
Defendant:
Matrixx Initiatives Incorporated and Zicam LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Acosta et al v. Huppenthal et al
as 4:2010cv00623
Plaintiff:
Curtis Acosta , Sean Arce , Maria Federico Brummer and others
Defendant:
Tom Horne , Vicki Balantine, Jacob Moore and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodenhurst vs. State of Hawaii; et al.
as 2:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Walter V Rodenhurst, III
Defendant:
Kay Bauman , Kenneth Zienkiewicz , Frank J Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rodenhurst vs. State of Hawaii; et al.
as 9:2010cv01237
Plaintiff:
Walter V Rodenhurst, III
Defendant:
Kay Bauman , Kenneth Zienkiewicz , Frank J. Lopez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv01192
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
