Cases 41 - 50 of 86
Banks v. Obama et al
as 1:2015cv00931
Plaintiff:
Frederick Banks
Defendant:
Barack Obama , Richard Burr , Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
(PS) Maxey v. Clinton et al
as 2:2015cv01018
Defendant:
Darrell Steinberg, Benjamin Wagner, Dianne Feinstein and others
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Maxey v. Boxer et al
as 2:2015cv01006
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
Barbara Boxer, Barack Obama, Dianne Feinstein and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Maxey v. United States et al
as 2:2014cv02996
Plaintiff:
James C. Maxey
Defendant:
United States, Department of the Air Force, Barack Obama and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
ROBINSON v. OBAMA et al
as 1:2014cv00568
Plaintiff:
DAVID ROBINSON, JR.
Defendant:
BARACK HUSSEIN OBAMA, II, GEORGE WALKER BUSH, ERIC CANTOR and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ADAMS v. MCCAIN et al
as 1:2014cv00289
Plaintiff:
DALE BRENT ADAMS
Defendant:
JOHN MCCAIN, MITCH MCCONNELL, HARRY REID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
IDROGO v. FOXX et al
as 1:2013cv01662
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL IDROGO
Defendant:
ANTHONY FOXX, PATRICK J. LEAHY, DIANNE FEINSTEIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McMasters-Stone et al v. Biden
as 2:2012cv02711
Plaintiff:
Thomas J. McMasters-Stone
Defendant:
Joseph Biden, Daniel Akaka, John Barrasso and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keith Judd et al v. Barack Obama et al
as 8:2012cv01507
Defendant:
Michael Astrue, John Avlon, Ballot Law Commission of State of Hew Hampshire and others
Plaintiff:
David Farrar, Keith Judd, Leah Lax and others
Dr Jeffrey A Rosenberg v. Congressman Elton Galleghly et al
as 2:2011cv08776
Defendant:
Senator (Rep) Barbara Boxer, Congressman (Rep) Lois Capps, Richard H Chambers and others
KNBC-4 LA:
NBC 4 LA
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey A Rosenberg
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
