Cases 41 - 50 of 124
Kensu v. Nessel
as 2:2022cv11834
Plaintiff:
Temujin Kensu
Defendant:
Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bowles v. Franks et al
as 2:2022cv11311
Plaintiff:
Glenn Bowles, Kenneth Franks and Robert Gardner
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Conyers v. Garrett
as 2:2022cv11152
Plaintiff:
Monica Conyers
Defendant:
Cathy M. Garrett and Dana Nessel
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gasca E. de los M. v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION
as 2:2022cv10978
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Gasca E. de los M.
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION and Dana Nessel
Powell, et al. v. Michigan, State of, et al
as 5:2022cv10816
Plaintiff:
Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truh Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent, Michael Elliot Powell sui juris, Settlor and Trust Protector of Family of Truth Allah [Irrevocable Express] Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent and Family of Trust Allah Trust Doing business as Registered Trust Agent
Defendant:
Gretchen Whitmer, Dana Nessel, Detroit, City of and others
Nelson v. Nessel et al
as 2:2022cv10799
Plaintiff:
Wayne Nelson
Defendant:
Dana Nessel, Kym Worthy and Mike Duggan
Clervrain et al v. Peters et al
as 4:2022cv10743
Plaintiff:
Manetirony Clervrain, Wesline Casir, Biglauwick Plaisimond and others
Defendant:
Gary Peters, Debbie Stabenow, Andy Levin and others
Nessel v. Lula Cellars, LLC
as 1:2022cv00197
Plaintiff:
Dana Nessel
Defendant:
Lula Cellars, LLC doing business as Lula Cellars
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1367 Supplemental Jurisdiction
Cardello-Smith v. Michigan Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2022cv10520
Plaintiff:
Derrick Lee Cardello-Smith
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Corrections, Executive Policy Team/Committee of MDOC, Administrative Management Team/Division of MDOC and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
