Cases 41 - 50 of 9,517
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04113
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal
(PS) Memmott v. Manning et al
as 2:2024cv01395
Plaintiff:
Orion Douglas Memmott
Defendant:
Bonnie Manning and Daniel Koehler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
(SS) Green v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2024cv01381
Plaintiff:
Raymond Daniel Green
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02929
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02931
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv02876
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Kimner v. Graber et al
as 5:2024cv02912
Defendant:
Danielle J. Forrest, Judge Susan P. Graber, Danielle J. Hunsaker and others
Plaintiff:
Audrey L. Kimner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Anaya v. Vasquez et al
as 3:2024cv00863
Plaintiff:
Daniel Rivera Anaya
Defendant:
V. Vasquez, T. Harley, Case Management Coordinator and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 bv Bivens Non-Prisoner
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv02877
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Ascot Specialty Insurance Company v. Goyette, Ruano & Thompson, Inc. et al
as 2:2024cv01365
Plaintiff:
Ascot Specialty Insurance Company
Defendant:
Goyette, Ruano & Thompson, Inc., Daniel Thompson and Joshua Siipola
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Declaratory Judgement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
