Cases 41 - 50 of 70
Haugen v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 7:2022cv00014
Petitioner:
Amber Lynn Haugen
Respondent:
Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wells v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 4:2021cv01384
Petitioner:
Amos Wells
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jenkins v. O'Daniel
as 1:2021cv01160
Plaintiff:
Tyrone-Lee Jenkins
Defendant:
Patrick O'Daniel and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jimenez v. Lumpkin
as 2:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Salvador Jimenez, III
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Sullivan v. Strong
as 3:2021cv03121
Petitioner:
Ronnie Curtis Sullivan
Respondent:
Kelly Strong and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Pasillas v. Thompson et al
as 1:2021cv00203
Plaintiff:
Steve Pasillas
Defendant:
FNU Thompson, Bryan Collier, Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Devenport v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 2:2021cv00225
Plaintiff:
Toby Mack Devenport
Defendant:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin and Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kendall v. Garza et al
as 7:2021cv00205
Plaintiff:
Tracy Lee Kendall
Defendant:
Senior Warden Kimberly L. Garza and Assistant Warden R. Almanza
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Kendall v. Garza et al
as 4:2021cv00081
Petitioner:
Tracy Lee Kendall
Respondent:
Senior Warden Kimberly L. Garza, Assistant Warden R. Almanza and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Richard v. Collier-TDCJ Executive Director
as 3:2021cv02545
Petitioner:
Richard D Richard
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID, Brian Collier-TDCJ Executive Director and Director, TDCJ Bobby Lumpkin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
