Cases 41 - 50 of 100
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. et al v. ACTAVIS ELIZABETH, LLC et al
as 2:2017cv01666
Plaintiff:
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C, SERGEANTS BENEVOLENT ASSOCIATION HEALTH & WELFARE FUND, CSAR CASTILLO, INC. and others
Defendant:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC., BRECKENRIDGE PHARMACEUTICALS, INC., UDL LABORATORIES INC. and others
Consolidated Defendant:
QUALITEST PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD.
Intervenor:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. et al v. LANNETT COMPANY, INC. et al
as 2:2017cv01665
Plaintiff:
FWK HOLDINGS, L.L.C. , 1199SEIU NATIONAL BENEFIT FUND, AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN and others
Consol_plaintiff:
CESAR CASTILLO, INC. and AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN
Defendant:
LANNETT COMPANY, INC. , MYLAN PHARMACEUTICALS INC. , SANDOZ, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN v. MYLAN, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01113
Plaintiff:
AMERICAN FEDERATION OF STATE, COUNTY AND MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN
Defendant:
MYLAN, INC. , TARO PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD., TARO PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Mylan, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv01164
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Mylan, Inc., Taro Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd., Taro Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv00980
Plaintiff:
Sergeants Benevolent Association Health & Welfare Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Breckenridge Pharmaceutical, Inc., Heritage Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Actavis Elizabeth, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv01039
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Actavis Elizabeth, LLC, Teva Pharmaceuticals USA, Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Smith v. Metropolitan Museum of Art
as 17-279
Plaintiff - Appellant:
James Smith
Defendant - Appellee:
Metropolitan Museum of Art, John and Jane Does 1-10, XYZ Corp. 1-20 and others
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan v. Lannett Company, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv00643
Plaintiff:
American Federation of State County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Lannett Company, Inc. , Mylan Pharaceuticals, Inc. and Sandoz, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1
Cesar Castillo, Inc. v. Sandoz, Inc. et al
as 1:2016cv09949
Plaintiff:
Cesar Castillo, Inc. , 1199SEIU National Benefit Fund and American Federation of State, County and Municipal Employees District Council 37 Health & Security Plan
Defendant:
Sandoz, Inc., Novartis AG, Lannett Company, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 15
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. et al v. UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
as 2:2016cv04870
Plaintiff:
TEVA PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRIES LTD. , TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS USA, INC. , BARR PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. and others
Defendant:
UNITEDHEALTHCARE SERVICES, INC.
Movant:
VISTA HEALTHPLAN, INC. and JEFFREY R. KRINSK
Intervenor_plaintiff:
PENNSYLVANIA TURNPIKE COMMISSION , PENNSYLVANIA EMPLOYEES BENEFIT TRUST FUND , DISTRICT COUNCIL 37 HEALTH & SECURITY PLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
