Cases
Cases 41 - 50 of 500
Duong HoIn re: Duong Ho
as 23-12262
Petitioner: In re: DUONG THANH HO
Respondent: ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF GEORGIA and ATTORNEY GENERAL, STATE OF FLORIDA
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2023cv01481
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Tobias Teixeira Da Fonseca v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv02536
Plaintiff: Tobias Teixeira Da Fonseca
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, Nguyen Duc Quan, xiongdidian0815 and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Duong v. Garland
as 23-441
Petitioner: HUONG DUONG
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Dangelas v. Suong
as 4:2023cv01898
Plaintiff: Maya Dangelas
Defendant: Duong Van Suong
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv00628
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Hung Nguon v. James Hill
as 23-55313
Petitioner / Appellant: HUNG DUONG NGUON
Respondent / Appellee: RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden and JAMES HILL, Warden
Brigid Ashwood v. The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A
as 1:2023cv00903
Plaintiff: Brigid Ashwood
Defendant: The Partnerships and Unincorporated Associations Identified on Schedule A, KudrePrints, xuexinyu and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Speedmark Transportation, Inc. v. Tommy Duong et al
as 2:2023cv02027
Plaintiff: Speedmark Transportation, Inc.
Defendant: Tommy Duong, Hecny Brokerage Services, Inc. and Hecny Transportation, Inc.
Duong v. Riccitiello et al
as 5:2022cv08926
Plaintiff: Tom Duong and Krishna Movva
Defendant: John S. Riccitiello, Kimberly Jabal, Luis Felipe Visoso and others

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?