Cases 41 - 50 of 303
Lawson v. Louis et al
as 4:2022cv00632
Plaintiff:
Christopher D Lawson
Defendant:
Linda Louis, DeAngilo Earl, Marshall Dale Reed and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bradley v. Marshall et al
as 3:2022cv00157
Plaintiff:
Earl Bradley
Defendant:
Patricia Marshall, Susan Duffel, Matt Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Perkins v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2022cv00500
Plaintiff:
Earl Perkins
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson and Ethicon Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Mosley v. Payne et al
as 4:2022cv00480
Plaintiff:
John H Mosley
Defendant:
Dexter Payne, Marshall Reed, Linda Louis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pittman v. Thurston et al
as 6:2022cv06049
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Pittman
Defendant:
John Thurston, Dexter Payne, Dr. Thomas Daniels and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Lewis v. Fowler et al
as 3:2022cv00105
Plaintiff:
Marvin Earl Joe Lewis, Sr.
Defendant:
Thomas Fowler, Heather Owens, Marty Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Bohannon v. Stuckey
as 4:2022cv00215
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Bohannon
Defendant:
Ronald Stuckey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Earl et al
as 1:2022cv01011
Plaintiff:
Gary Nicholson
Defendant:
D Earl, Wellpath Medical Services, K Marter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Nicholson v. Earl et al
as 4:2022cv00173
Plaintiff:
Gary Nicholson
Defendant:
D Earl, Wellpath Medical Services, K Marter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Earls v. Case et al
as 3:2022cv00033
Plaintiff:
Jacob Thomas Earls
Defendant:
Robert Case, Steve Franks, Brianna Foster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
