Cases 41 - 50 of 194
CREEKBAUM v. CREEKBAUM
as 2:2021cv00083
Plaintiff:
GEORGE EARL CREEKBAUM, III
Defendant:
BEVERLY M. CREEKBAUM
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Thompson v. Luttrull et al
as 1:2021cv00011
Defendant:
Jerry Drook, Gregg Melton, Brian Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Victor Earl Thompson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BRANCH v. COOK GROUP et al
as 1:2020cv06284
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL INCORPORATED, COOK DENMARK HOLDING APS, MEDICAL ENGINEERING AND DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE, INC. and others
Plaintiff:
EARL BRANCH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020cv02326
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
RISNER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv02068
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
EARL RISNER
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
OWENS v. CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY et al
as 1:2020cv01900
Defendant:
HAROLD BLAKE, CONSOLIDATED CITY OF INDIANAPOLIS AND MARION COUNTY and MATTHEW MCFADDEN
Plaintiff:
EARL OWENS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SLEDGE v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv01724
Defendant:
COOK MEDICAL LLC, COOK INCORPORATED and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
EARL SLEDGE, JR.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NA MAIN STREET LLC et al v. COOK et al
as 1:2020cv01335
Plaintiff:
EARL F HAMM, JR, AFI VENTURES LLC, TAD THOMAS and others
Defendant:
ERIC HOLCOLM, DAVID COOK, CURTIS HILL and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00238
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
SMALLEY et al v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2020cv00822
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Plaintiff:
EARL S. SMALLEY, JR. and RHONDA SMALLEY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
