Cases 41 - 50 of 116
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2018cv00329
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Borne v. AAY Security LLC
as 1:2017cv00510
Plaintiff:
Darin Borne , Margaret Ellison and John Johnson
Defendant:
AAY Security LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Ellison v. Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
as 4:2017cv00911
Plaintiff:
Angela Ellison
Defendant:
Allstate Fire and Casualty Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Insurance Contract
Ellison v. Aames Funding Corporation et al
as 4:2017cv00560
Plaintiff:
Angela N. Ellison
Defendant:
Aames Funding Corporation , Aames Investment Corporation , CWABS, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Belcher v. Williamson County, Texas et al
as 1:2017cv00153
Plaintiff:
Royce Belcher
Defendant:
Deputy Jeremy Ellison, Deputy FNU Gauna and Williamson County, Texas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Garza v. Elite Roof Solutions, Inc. et al
as 4:2017cv00446
Plaintiff:
Jose Garza
Defendant:
Elite Roof Solutions, Inc. and Evan M. Ellison
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 5
Ellison v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv00012
Petitioner:
Reginald Ellison
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Ellison v. Ross
as 6:2016cv01314
Plaintiff:
Larry M. Ellison
Defendant:
Allen Wade Ross
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ellison et al v. Pace Opportunity Centers, Inc.
as 6:2016cv01263
Plaintiff:
Angela Ellison and Jamey Chustz
Defendant:
Pace Opportunity Centers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Jenkins v. Central Grievance Office-TDCJ et al
as 4:2016cv03252
Plaintiff:
Moses Jenkins
Defendant:
Central Grievance Office-TDCJ, Governor of Texas (Board of Criminal Justice), Executive Director CID and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
