Cases 41 - 50 of 53
HILL v. JETT
as 1:2008cv00091
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
BRIAN R. JETT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. JETT et al
as 1:2007cv02324
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
BRIAN R. JETT and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF MARYLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hill v. Jett et al
as 1:2007cv03232
Petitioner:
Eric Rodney Hill
Respondent:
Brian R. Jett and The Attorney General of the State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 2:2007cv00223
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
R. V. VEACH, B. R. JETT, ANTHONY BOYD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2007cv02110
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
HILL v. DC CORPORATION COUNSEL et al
as 1:2007cv01424
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
DC CORPORATION COUNSEL, SUPERIOR COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA and DC GOVERNMENT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS et al
as 2:2007cv00201
Plaintiff:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Defendant:
FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, TERRE HAUTE FEDERAL CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION, RICK V. VEACH and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HILL v. VEACH et al
as 1:2007cv01137
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH and KENNETH L. WAINSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 2:2007cv00130
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Respondent:
R. V. VEACH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
HILL v. VEACH
as 1:2007cv00886
Respondent:
RICK V. VEACH
Petitioner:
ERIC RODNEY HILL
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
