Cases 41 - 50 of 200
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2021cv00093
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Wilson v. Quintana et al
as 5:2020cv00441
Defendant:
Assistant Warden Cobert, Warden Francisco J. Quintana, Correctional Officer R. Oller and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Eugene Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Royalty v. Chandler et al
as 5:2020cv00401
Defendant:
Captain Mrs. Tabott, Brandi Renee Ritchie, Judge Maddox and others
Plaintiff:
Garrett Eugene Royalty, II and Garratt Eugene Royalty, II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Scalia v. Kentucky Bankers Association et al
as 3:2020cv00636
Defendant:
Kentucky Bankers Association Health and Welfare Benefit Program, Burt Bellamy, Kentucky Bankers Association and others
Plaintiff:
Eugene Scalia
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001
Eugene Neal v. Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc. et al
as 5:2020cv00340
Defendant:
McKesson Corporation, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP and Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Eugene Neal
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Wolski v. SSA
as 7:2020cv00108
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene Wolski
Defendant:
Commissioner of SSA
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Young et al v. THEHUT.COM Limited et al
as 3:2020cv00526
Plaintiff:
Joseph McGaughey, Jason Eugene Young, Donald McEntire and others
Defendant:
THG International, LLC, THEHUT.COM Limited, The Hut Group and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Troxell v. Hart
as 6:2020cv00119
Respondent:
DeEdra Hart
Petitioner:
Destil Eugene Troxell
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Martin v. Gilley
as 6:2020cv00077
Respondent:
Warden Gilley
Petitioner:
Arthur Eugene Martin
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Miller et al v. Sleem
as 3:2020cv00153
Plaintiff:
Eugene Miller, Cynthia Miller and Evetta Coleman
Defendant:
Paul R Sleem
Petitioner:
Scott A Wallitsch
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
