Cases 41 - 50 of 93
Gallow et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00790
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff:
Mary Gallow , Tammy Abell , Diana Ahlbin and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Harders et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 3:2017cv00726
Defendant:
JOHNSON & JOHNSON , JOHNSON & JOHNSON CONSUMER PRODUCTS, INC. and IMERYS TALC AMERICA INC
Plaintiff:
Christine Harders , Tammy Abell , Karen Arnholt and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HAYES v. SCHAFFER et al
as 1:2016cv09156
Plaintiff:
JAMIE HAYES
Defendant:
GARY G. SCHAFFER, JOHN D. MAHER, ROBERT A. NOLAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
HUNT et al v. HARRIS et al
as 1:2016cv05450
Plaintiff:
JOSHUA HUNT and AMBER HUNT
Defendant:
WAYNE FARRELL HARRIS , J.B. HUNT TRANSPORT, INC. , JOHN DOE 1-5 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal- Auto Negligence
SANDERS v. OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS et al
as 3:2016cv05380
Plaintiff:
MICHOLE SANDERS
Defendant:
OCEAN COUNTY BOARD OF FREEHOLDERS, OCEAN COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, PRISON HEALTH SERVICES INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
FARRELL v. SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA et al
as 2:2016cv04391
Plaintiff:
LAWRENCE FARRELL
Defendant:
SONY CORPORATION OF AMERICA , SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC and SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT AMERICA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
WASHINGTON COMMONS, LLC et al v. THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY et al
as 2:2016cv01458
Plaintiff:
WASHINGTON COMMONS, LLC , NEIL SORRENTINO , SERIFINO TOMASETTI and others
Defendant:
THE CITY OF JERSEY CITY, MARIANO VEGA, JEREMY FARRELL, ESQ. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv06085
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0158
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
