Cases 41 - 50 of 75
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv13756
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1218
Flynn v. AMERIDOSE, LLC. et al
as 1:2014cv13371
Defendant:
AMERIDOSE, LLC., UniFirst Coporation and Liberty Industries, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Mindy Flynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv30177
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Parris et al v. Cabral
as 1:2013cv11010
Plaintiff:
Edwin Parris , James Antonetti , John Barry and others
Defendant:
Andrea J. Cabral
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
RH v. Maloney et al
as 1:2013cv10727
Plaintiff:
RH
Defendant:
Cheryl R Maloney, Edward Heller, Richard A Manley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Local 369, Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO et al v. National Grid USA
as 1:2013cv10261
Plaintiff:
Local 369, Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO , Local 317, Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO , Local 318, Utility Workers Union of America, AFL-CIO and others
Defendant:
National Grid USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Franklin et al v. Newton Wellesley Hospital et al
as 1:2012cv11919
Plaintiff:
Ann Wallis Franklin and Elizabeth Paine Franklin
Defendant:
Newton Wellesley Hospital, James Kligenstein, William Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Kunz v. Cox et al
as 4:2012cv40037
Plaintiff:
Kai Kunz
Defendant:
Kristin Cox, Anthony J Benedetti, Flynn and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
United States of America v. Flynn
as 1:2012mc91093
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Karin E. Flynn
Hardiman et al v. United States of America et al
as 1:2011cv12181
Plaintiff:
Thomas Hardiman and Affiliated Foot Care, PC
Defendant:
United States of America and Martin G. Flynn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
