Cases 41 - 50 of 79
FRY et al v. E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
as 2:2012cv03675
Plaintiff:
RONALD FRY , CAROL FRY , SALLY KELLS and others
Defendant:
E I DU PONT DE NEMOURS AND COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry et al v. Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 4:2012cv01207
Plaintiff:
Joseph Fry and Bobbi Jo Fry
Defendant:
Depuy Orthopaedics, Inc., DePuy Inc., DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Fry Communications, Inc. v. Ambassador Media Group, LLC
as 1:2012cv00540
Plaintiff:
Fry Communications, Inc.
Defendant:
Ambassador Media Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Forrest v. Sauers et al
as 3:2012cv00044
Petitioner:
Michael Forrest
Respondent:
Debra K. Sauers, Cert Attack Guards, Staff and Guards and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
WATSON v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2011cv07640
Plaintiff:
JOSEPH WATSON
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, STANLEY CHMIELEWSKI, RAYMOND D. ROBERTS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
KE v. DREXEL UNIVERSITY et al
as 2:2011cv06708
Plaintiff:
LEI KE
Defendant:
DREXEL UNIVERSITY, JOHN FRY, RICHARD HOMAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
FRY v. SMOKER et al
as 5:2011cv03015
Plaintiff:
PAUL FRY
Defendant:
W. CLAY SMOKER and THE TOWNSHIP OF MANOR TOWNSHIP
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JACKSON v. LEFTWICH et al
as 2:2011cv00470
Plaintiff:
ISAIAH JACKSON
Defendant:
DOROTHEA LEFTWICH , JONATHAN FRY and CITY OF PITTSBURGH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
FRY et al v. ANCHOR PACKING CO. et al
as 2:2010cv82710
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY M FRY and EDWARD D FRY
Defendant:
ANCHOR PACKING CO., ATLAS ASBESTOS CO., INC., A.W. CHESTERTON CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
FRY et al v. A.W. CHESTERTON CO. et al
as 2:2010cv81454
Plaintiff:
CONNIE BETH FRY and NEAL L FRY
Defendant:
A.W. CHESTERTON CO. , AMERICAN ASBESTOS CO., ANCHOR PACKING CO. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
