Cases 41 - 50 of 198
Garcia v. East Chicago Indiana et al
as 2:2022cv00036
Plaintiff:
Robert Garcia
Defendant:
East Chicago Indiana and Officer Schinderl
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Garcia v. Warden
as 3:2022cv00090
Petitioner:
Henry Garcia
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2801
Winston v. Doe et al
as 2:2022cv00016
Plaintiff:
Charles Winston
Defendant:
PO John Doe 1-2, John Doe and PO Gustavo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Farrell v. Buss et al
as 3:2022cv00066
Plaintiff:
Chad M Farrell
Defendant:
Dawn Buss, Ron Neal, Tate and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
BANEGAS et al v. ANTHONY-ANDERSON CORPORATION, et al
as 1:2022cv00088
Plaintiff:
Dennys Ricardo Aguilar Banegas and Edin Rafael Aguilar Banegas
Defendant:
Anthony-Anderson, Corporation, Garcia Brothers Painting LLC, Michael Green and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Garcia v. TSU-MA, Inc.
as 3:2021cv00864
Plaintiff:
Alberto Rosas Garcia
Defendant:
TSU-MA, INC. d/b/a LUX CAFE and TSU-MA, Inc. doing business as Lux Cafe
RUSTIA v. RN STAFF INC. et al
as 1:2021cv02477
Plaintiff:
MA. LUISA RUSTIA
Defendant:
RN STAFF INC. and MANUEL GARCIA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Garcia v. Richison et al
as 3:2021cv00669
Plaintiff:
Fabian M Garcia
Defendant:
Amy C Richison, Jeremy K Nix, Jennifer M Pyclik and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. Beasle et al
as 3:2021cv00665
Plaintiff:
Audrain Jones
Defendant:
Beasle, Ron Neal, Winn and others
Not Classified By Court:
WESTVILLE E-FILE(Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
GARCIA v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2021cv02381
Plaintiff:
MARY GARCIA
Defendant:
COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC, WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
