Cases 41 - 50 of 104
Jamil Bey, et al v. George Gascon, et al
as 19-17336
Defendant / Appellee:
BRADEN WOODS, Individually and officially, GEORGE GASCON, Individually and officially, AMADOR BRENNEMAN and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMIL BEY
Bey v. Gascon et al
as 3:2019cv03184
Defendant:
George Gascon, Amador Brenneman, Charlene Padovani Kiesselbach and others
Plaintiff:
Jamil Bey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
James Reem v. Vicki Hennessy, et al
as 19-15727
Defendant / Appellee:
VICKI HENNESSY, San Francisco Sheriff, CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO and GEORGE GASCON, San Francisco D.A.
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES J. REEM
Watson v. Gascon et al
as 5:2019cv01698
Defendant:
City of San Francisco, A.D.A. George Gascon and A.D.A. Andrew Ganz
Plaintiff:
DeAndre Dwayne Watson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
McKenzie v. City and County of San Francisco et al
as 4:2018cv07141
Defendant:
George Gascon, David Crew, Jerry Rodriguez and others
Plaintiff:
Henry G. McKenzie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bibbs v. Gascon et al
as 5:2018cv07277
Defendant:
A.D.A. Andrew Ganz, H.D.A. George Gascon and City of San Francisco
Plaintiff:
Maurice Eugene Bibbs, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith v. San Francisco District Attorney's Office et al
as 3:2018cv06747
Defendant:
George Gascon, Alexandra Pray and San Francisco District Attorney's Office
Plaintiff:
Lewis Francis Smith, Jr.II
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Jones v. City & County of San Francisco et al
as 3:2018cv05414
Defendant:
George Gascon, Edward Reiskin, Jennifer Siebel Newsom and others
Plaintiff:
Romeo Jones
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Reem v. Hennessy et al
as 3:2018cv05747
Defendant:
George Gascon, Vicki Hennessy and City and County of San Francisco
Plaintiff:
James J. Reem
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bonilla v. Gascon
as 3:2017cv06250
Plaintiff:
Steven Wayne Bonilla
Defendant:
George Gascon
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
