Cases 41 - 50 of 69
KNIGHTEN v. ZATECKY et al
as 1:2014cv01955
Defendant:
GIBBS, MILLER and DUSHAN ZATECKY
Plaintiff:
UNDRAY KNIGHTEN
Miscellaneou:
PENDLETON CF (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv01308
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
GIBBS v. COLVIN
as 2:2014cv00127
Defendant:
CAROLYN W. COLVIN
Plaintiff:
SHANE A. GIBBS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 402 Social Security Benefits
Gibbs et al v. Biomet Orthopedics LLC et al
as 3:2014cv00367
Defendant:
Biomet Orthopedics LLC , Biomet US Reconstruction LLC , Biomet Manufacturing LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Gibbs and Tami Lynn Gibbs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gibbs-EL v. Superintendent
as 1:2013cv00257
Petitioner:
Kenneth Willis Gibbs-EL
Respondent:
Superintendent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv00261
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
GIBBS-EL v. SUPERINTENDENT, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
as 1:2012cv01255
Petitioner:
KENNETH W. GIBBS-EL
Respondent:
SUPERINTENDENT, MIAMI CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
GIBBS-EL v. FLOYD COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT et al
as 1:2012cv00682
Defendant:
FLOYD COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ARTHUR HEGEWALD, INDIANA PAROLE BOARD MEMBERS and others
Unknown:
KENNETH WILLIS GIBBS-EL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GIBBS v. ASTRUE
as 1:2012cv00590
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Plaintiff:
KIMBERLY A. GIBBS
Miscellaneou:
SSA (Court Use Only)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv01138
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Sex)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
