Cases 41 - 50 of 1,202
Sachs v. Loeffler
as 8:2024cv00067
Plaintiff:
Gregory H. Sachs
Defendant:
Vera Loeffler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Bey et al v. Landon et al
as 8:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Jermaine Bolden Bey and Leonie Bolden Bey
Defendant:
Bill Landon, Stanley C. Middleman, Jefferey B. Lown, II and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Jones v. Kim et al
as 1:2023cv03506
Plaintiff:
Gary Jones
Defendant:
P. Kim, Gregory Fischer, Lisa Fischelman and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Savoy v. Werner et al
as 1:2023cv03378
Plaintiff:
Kendrick Lamont Savoy
Defendant:
Maryland Correctional Institution of Hagerstown, Gregory Werner and Phil Morgan
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03324
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03301
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 706 Judicial Review of Agency Action
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv03236
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2023cv03212
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
