Cases 41 - 50 of 261
Smith v. Del City City of
as 5:2020cv00900
Defendant:
Del City City of
Plaintiff:
Gregory Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gordon v. United States of America
as 5:2020cv00878
Respondent:
United States of America
Petitioner:
Gregory Garnett Gordon
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Wilson v. Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director
as 5:2020cv00545
Respondent:
Oklahoma Department of Corrections Director
Petitioner:
Gregory Clint Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Malone v. Crow
as 4:2020cv00227
Petitioner:
Gregory Kyle Malone
Defendant:
Scott Crow
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Webster et al v. Barr et al
as 4:2020cv00225
Defendant:
Scott S Harris, Jacob Levitan, Gregory Frizzell and others
Plaintiff:
Dwayne Marvin Garrett and Shirley Dione Webster
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Galatian v. CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC
as 5:2020cv00229
Plaintiff:
Gregory Scott Galatian
Defendant:
CoreCivic of Tennessee LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
George v. Whitten
as 5:2020cv00108
Petitioner:
Gregory Allan George
Respondent:
Rick Whitten
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Gregory v. Med-Data, Incorporated
as 4:2020cv00051
Defendant:
Med-Data, Incorporated
Plaintiff:
Charity I Gregory
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
City of Oklahoma City v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and Other Related Pump Station Continuous Extended Term Easements and rights-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00020
Defendant:
Christian Bartholomew Switch, Herbert Joe White, Nancy Gay White Mann and others
Plaintiff:
City of Oklahoma City
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Oklahoma City City of v. 100 Foot Wide Continuous Extended Term Easement and right-of-way for public utility water pipelines et al
as 5:2020cv00028
Defendant:
Kaseca L Frank, Jr, Brent Grynnel Watson, Zelda Mae Kaseca Foreman and others
Plaintiff:
Oklahoma City City of
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1358
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
