Cases 41 - 50 of 64
Myers v. BANK OF AMERICA N.A.,
as 3:2017cv00968
Plaintiff:
Gregory B. Myers
Defendant:
BANK OF AMERICA N.A.,
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv03396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02781
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv02537
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01239
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2017cv01218
Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Trustee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 11 U.S.C. § 101
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv04281
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Carlos G. Rocha v. J. Gordon Rudd, Jr., et al
as 15-1538
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CARLOS G. ROCHA
Defendant - Appellee:
J. GORDON RUDD, JR., ANNE T. REGAN, PATRICIA A. BLOODGOOD and others
Myers v. Flagstar Bank, FSB et al
as 3:2015cv05067
Plaintiff:
Gregory A. Myers
Defendant:
Flagstar Bank, FSB , MTC Financial Inc. and Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
Barbara Kelly, et al v. Regions Bank
as 14-12865
Plaintiff - Appellant:
BARBARA ANN KELLY and GREGORY BRIAN MYERS
Defendant - Appellee:
REGIONS BANK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
