Cases 41 - 50 of 54
Serrano v. New York City et al
as 1:2013cv00601
Defendant:
Police Officer Gunn, Police Officer John Doe and New York City
Plaintiff:
Frankie Serrano
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dawson v. City of New York et al
as 1:2012cv06150
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Brian Gunn, Sergeant Brian Hallman and others
Plaintiff:
Jason Dawson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Gunn v. USA
as 1:2012cv06632
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Roderick Gunn
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
Thompson v. Shinseki et al
as 1:2012cv00822
Plaintiff:
Charles A. Thompson
Defendant:
Eric K. Shinseki, Will A. Gunn and Department of VA Affairs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Gunn v. AMBAC Assurance Corporation et al
as 1:2011cv05497
Plaintiff:
La Mar Gunn
Defendant:
AMBAC Assurance Corporation and EQCC Home Equity Loan Trust
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gunn v. City of New York et al
as 1:2011cv01063
Defendant:
City of New York, Police Officer Mark DeSimone and Police Officer John Does 1-3
Plaintiff:
Pauline Gunn
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Rodriguez et al v. The City of New York et al
as 1:2010cv02500
Defendant:
Brian Gunn, Kevin Hammerschlag, Steven Humburg and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Rodriguez, Carmen Rodriguez, Christine Rodriguez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Wilder v. Department of Correction N. Y.C. et al
as 1:2010cv03187
Plaintiff:
Marion B. Wilder
Defendant:
Department of Correction N. Y.C., E.H. Bailey, Taylor and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gunn v. Artus
as 9:2010cv00060
Petitioner:
Darrell Gunn
Respondent:
Dale Artus
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Boatwright v. Ball et al
as 1:2009cv00899
Plaintiff:
Maurice Boatwright, Maurice Boatwright and Maurice Boatwright
Defendant:
John E. Ball, Steven A. Blask, Dee F. Gunn and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
