Cases 41 - 50 of 435
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2023cv00038
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Fain v. Hill et al
as 7:2022cv00687
Plaintiff:
William David Fain
Defendant:
Deputy Daniel Hill, Sgt. Brain Hubbard and Lt. Nick Pennelton
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00666
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Ofc. Gilbert, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Gilbert et al
as 7:2022cv00665
Plaintiff:
Alucious Williams, Jr.
Defendant:
Gilbert, Ofc. Gilbert, Boyd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Marine v. Hill
as 7:2022cv00647
Plaintiff:
James Porter Marine, Jr.
Defendant:
Daniel Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dickson v. Kahn et al
as 1:2022cv01222
Plaintiff:
Simone Dickson
Defendant:
Lawrence E. Kahn, Jill S. Polk, Aaron Poindexter and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Wilson v. O'Bryant, et al.
as 3:2022cv00691
Plaintiff:
Vincent Wilson
Defendant:
Deputy O'Bryant, Lieutenant Howerton, Deputy Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hill v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 3:2022cv00688
Plaintiff:
Daisy Hill
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA (Social Security Administration)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 416 Denial of Social Security Benefits
Hill v. Baron et al
as 2:2022cv00436
Plaintiff:
John T. Hill
Defendant:
Joe Baron, WellPath and Mrs. Samboy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Vessell v. Petty, et al.
as 7:2022cv00578
Plaintiff:
Amanda Vessell
Defendant:
Andy Petty, Rob Coleman, Daniel Hill and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
