Cases 41 - 50 of 937
Kinner v. Perkins et al
as 3:2023cv00215
Plaintiff:
Timmy Kinner
Defendant:
Mark Perkins, Bernard Reed, Tyler Watson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. GlaxoSmithKline et al
as 3:2023cv15159
Plaintiff:
Sharon Hinkle
Defendant:
GlaxoSmithKline, Patheon Inc., Pfizer Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HINKLE v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv04398
Plaintiff:
DAVID HINKLE
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinkle v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv13370
Plaintiff:
Jay Hinkle
Defendant:
Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation, Boehringer Ingelheim USA Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hinkle v. Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. et al
as 3:2023cv13393
Defendant:
Walmart Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Boehringer Ingelheim Corporation and others
Plaintiff:
Jack Hinkle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Demmerick Brown v. Harold Clarke
as 23-6131
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DENRICK ERIC BROWN, a/k/a Demmerick Eric Brown
Defendant / Appellee:
HAROLD W. CLARKE, Director, DAVID A. ROBINSON, Chief of Operations, GEORGE M. HINKLE and others
Hinkle v. Thomas et al
as 3:2023cv00069
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Alex W. Thomas and Zhiirkane James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Newman
as 3:2023cv00066
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Nick Newman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Weyand
as 3:2023cv00065
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Matt Weyand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hinkle v. Lindsey
as 3:2023cv00067
Plaintiff:
Kevin DeShawn Hinkle
Defendant:
Demetrius W. Lindsey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
