Cases 41 - 50 of 65
HOLDEN v. FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
as 2:2011cv51162
Plaintiff:
JOHN P. HOLDEN
Defendant:
FOSTER WHEELER COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HELM et al v. ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC. et al
as 2:2011cv01136
Plaintiff:
WILLIAM HELM , DEBORAH PRISE , HEATHER P. RADY and others
Defendant:
ALDERWOODS GROUP, INC. and ALDERWOODS GROUP, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
HOLDEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv48091
Plaintiff:
HENRY F. HOLDEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
HOLDEN v. SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION et al
as 2:2011cv03742
Plaintiff:
SHIRLEY HOLDEN
Defendant:
SMITHKLINE BEECHAM CORPORATION , GLAXOSMITHKLINE PLC , GLAXO WELLCOME UK LTD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
SURYA v. HOLDEN
as 2:2011cv03646
Plaintiff:
VENU SURYA
Defendant:
JEFFREY HOLDEN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLDEN v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv07382
Plaintiff:
RALPH HOLDEN
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
BENKERT et al v. GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
as 2:2010cv06314
Plaintiff:
RENE BENKERT , KENNETH BOCHNIAK , WAYNE CATTES and others
Defendant:
GLAXOSMITHKLINE LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
HOLDEN v. PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, ET.AL, (DEFENDANTS)
as 2:2010cv04642
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HOLDEN
Defendant:
PHILADELPHIA DISTRICT ATTORNEY OFFICE, ET.AL, (DEFENDANTS)
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
HOLDEN v. FIBREBOARD CORPORATION et al
as 2:2010cv75214
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HOLDEN
Defendant:
FIBREBOARD CORPORATION , JAMES R. COLSON and JAMES H. COLWELL
Thirdparty_defendant:
JAMES E. BURKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
VON HOLDEN v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2010cv40371
Plaintiff:
JOACHIM R. VON HOLDEN
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 688
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
