Cases 41 - 50 of 130
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. FORUPK LLC et al
as 1:2019cv07970
Defendant:
FORUPK LLC and MICHAEL SOLL
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
PUTNEY v. NEW JERSEY DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv15716
Defendant:
SCO. CLARK, SGT. GILBERT, JOHN DOES 1-5 and others
Plaintiff:
CHARLES PUTNEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SWEDESBORO CIGARS LLC et al
as 1:2018cv14283
Defendant:
ANTHONY DIDONATO and SWEDESBORO CIGARS LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. SHARPERSON et al
as 2:2018cv12388
Defendant:
MERVEL CORP. and ANTHONY SHARPERSON
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
VERITY ENERGY ADVISORS, LLC v. PENCE et al
as 2:2018cv11978
Defendant:
TODD (ANON HEALTH TECH #1), APN ANN BATES, DR SANTOSH MAHARJAN and others
Plaintiff:
VERITY ENERGY ADVISORS, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. CUSTODIO, INC. et al
as 3:2018cv11472
Defendant:
JOAO CUSTODIO and CUSTODIO, INC.
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. ABUAWAD et al
as 2:2018cv11426
Defendant:
FADI ABUAWAD and FADI'S CAFE, LLC
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. BRADY et al
as 3:2018cv09185
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
EDWARD BRADY, CAROLYN BRADY and NANCY BRADY
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. COLUMBIAN CLUB OF UNION et al
as 2:2018cv01825
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
COLUMBIAN CLUB OF UNION and KNIGHTS OF COLUMBUS #4504
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC. v. FORT LEE ATHLETIC CLUB INC.
as 2:2018cv01860
Plaintiff:
JOE HAND PROMOTIONS, INC.
Defendant:
FORT LEE ATHLETIC CLUB INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
