Cases 41 - 50 of 82
Cloutman v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11375
Plaintiff:
Michael Cloutman
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Marlene Dodge, Dyana Nicki and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rector v. Department of Correction et al
as 1:2009cv11352
Plaintiff:
Eugene F. Rector
Defendant:
Department of Correction, Harold W. Clarke, Kristie Ladouceur and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Clarke
as 1:2009cv11254
Petitioner:
Robert E. Williams
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Klein v. Tocci et al
as 1:2009cv11248
Plaintiff:
Viktor Rolf Klein
Defendant:
Thomas M. Tocci, Pamela M O'Dell, Thomas Dickhaut and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damiano v. Clarke
as 1:2009cv11235
Petitioner:
Frank R. Damiano
Respondent:
Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Scanzillo v. O'Brien et al
as 1:2009cv11220
Petitioner:
Mark Scanzillo
Respondent:
John J. O'Brien and Harold W. Clarke
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11173
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Johnson
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke, Duane McEachern, Scott Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Klein v. Malone et al
as 1:2009cv11174
Plaintiff:
Viktor Rolf Klein
Defendant:
David W. Malone, Robert J. Almeida, Gregory A. Bedard and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McGee v. Umass Correctional Health et al
as 4:2009cv40120
Plaintiff:
Shirley Jay McGee
Defendant:
Umass Correctional Health, Charles Rountree, Jesse Hammon and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Pagan v. Clarke et al
as 1:2009cv11114
Plaintiff:
Juan Pagan
Defendant:
Harold W. Clarke and Peter St. Amand
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
