Cases 41 - 50 of 50
Continental Business Credit, Inc. v. Checkmate Cash Advance Centers, LLC et al
as 3:2010mc00010
Plaintiff:
Continental Business Credit, Inc.
Defendant:
Checkmate Cash Advance Centers, LLC, Checkmate Cash Advance Centers, Alabama, LLC, Checkmate Cash Advance Centers, South Carolina, LLC and others
Receiver:
S. Gregory Hays
Jardine et al v. Graham et al
as 2:2009cv01114
Plaintiff:
Jamie D Jardine and Erick Darrington
Defendant:
Alfonso Graham, James Hart, Jayne Hackbarth and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dye v. Bartow et al
as 2:2009cv00660
Plaintiff:
John L Dye, Jr
Defendant:
Byran Bartow, Thomas Speech, William Grosshans and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Wilson v. Sheehan et al
as 2:2009cv00189
Plaintiff:
Corey Wilson
Defendant:
Patrick Sheehan, Robert Metzger, Rory Hart and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hart v. Kohn Law Firm SC
as 2:2008cv01042
Plaintiff:
Pamela Hart
Defendant:
Kohn Law Firm SC
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Davalos v. City of Racine et al
as 2:2008cv00712
Plaintiff:
Cerafin Davalos
Defendant:
City of Racine, Jeff Coe, Robert Anderson and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Hart v. Astrue
as 2:2008cv00387
Plaintiff:
Shameille Hart
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Gidarisingh v. Malone et al
as 2:2008cv00082
Plaintiff:
Sonniel R Gidarisingh
Defendant:
Malone, Becker, Sgt Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hart v. ASTRUE
as 3:2008cv00007
Plaintiff:
Anne M. Hart
Defendant:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE and MICHAEL J. ASTRUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Crouthers v. GREER et al
as 3:2007cv00655
Plaintiff:
Lee Crouthers
Defendant:
JAMES GREER, DICK VERHAGEN, James Hart and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
