Cases filed in Indiana
Cases 41 - 50 of 56
REES v. REIFEL et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2015cv01339
Plaintiff: DUSTIN REES
Defendant: KERRI L. REIFEL, STEVEN T. SECOR and HEIDI VANZEE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
BOATNER v. COOK INCORPORATED et al
as 1:2015cv01187
Plaintiff: HEIDI BOATNER
Defendant: COOK INCORPORATED, COOK MEDICAL, LLC and WILLIAM COOK EUROPE APS
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2014cv02093
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00368
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
Sowers v. Quantum Financial Group, Inc.
as 3:2014cv01727
Plaintiff: Heidi L. Sowers
Defendant: Quantum Financial Group, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv00090
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227
WHITE v. THOMAS AND KING, INC, et al
as 1:2013cv00607
Defendant: COLLEEN MEYER, NJ, GREGORY MEYER, NJ and THOMAS AND KING, INC.
Plaintiff: HEIDI M. WHITE, In
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
LUEDTKE v. LUEDTKE-THOMSEN We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2012cv00750
Petitioner: NATHAN WILLIAM LUEDTKE
Respondent: HEIDI WYN LUEDTKE-THOMSEN
In Re: THE APPLICATION OF NATHAN WILLIAM LUEDTKE
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
BREWINGTON v. NEGANGARD et al
as 1:2011cv01144
Plaintiff: DANIEL BREWINGTON
Defendant: EDWARD J. CONNOR, DEARBORN COUNTY, INDIANA, JOHN DOES, 1 THROUGH 25 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
FARLEY et al v. GARGANO et al
as 1:2010cv01585
Defendant: MIKE CARR, PATRICIA CASANOVA and MICHAEL GARGANO
Plaintiff: D. F., E. F. and HEIDI FARLEY
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?