Cases 41 - 48 of 48
Holli Lundahl v. Albert Hawkins, et al
as 09-51163
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, also known as Holli Telford
Defendant - Appellee:
ALBERT HAWKINS, Commissioner for the Department of Health and Human services for the State of Texas, ANDREW ARNOTT, Employee of the Utah Department of Health and Human Services, LEONORE LOPEZ, Employee of the Utah Department of Health and Human Services and others
Holli Lundahl v. USA, et al
as 09-10980
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOLLI TELFORD LUNDAHL, personally and as assignee of M.D. Diet Companies
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, FEDERAL MEDICAL CENTER CARSWELL, R. E. GREGG and others
Holli Telford v. USA, et al
as 09-40465
Plaintiff - Appellant:
HOLLI TELFORD, also known as Holli Lundahl
Defendant - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, CHRISTINE ANTHONY, in her personal capacity, SONJA SORENSON, in her personal capacity and others
Telford v. United States of America et al
as 3:2009mc00002
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford
Defendant:
United States of America, Christine Anthony, Sonja Sorenson and others
Lundahl v. U.S. Attorney General et al
as 3:2009cv00174
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
U.S. Attorney General, U.S. Marshals Service, Mary Corporon and others
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lundahl v. United States of America et al
as 3:2008cv01990
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
United States of America, FMC-Carswell, R. E. Gregg and others
Amicu:
Law Offices of Morris Polich and Purdy
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lundahl v. Mukasey
as 3:2008cv01877
Petitioner:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Respondent:
Michael Mukasey
Amicu:
Elaine Chapman
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Lundahl v. United States Attorney General et al
as 1:2008cv00036
Plaintiff:
Holli Telford Lundahl
Defendant:
United States Attorney General, Commissioner of IRS, Director of the BOP and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
