Cases 41 - 50 of 97
Hutchinson v. USA
as 2:2016cv03240
Petitioner:
Marcus Hutchinson
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Cho et al v. Four M Franchising, LLC et al
as 7:2016cv01613
Defendant:
Four M Franchising, LLC , Four M Capital LLC , Four M Food Service of Atlantic Terminal LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Cho , Jennifer Walder , Christina O'Neill and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Ellis v. City of New York et al
as 1:2015cv02833
Defendant:
City of New York, Correction Officer Hutchinson and Captain Levy
Plaintiff:
Landel Ellis
Whose Names And Shield Numbers Are Unknown:
John Does 1-10
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Amerivape, Inc. v. Kruger et al
as 1:2015cv01874
Plaintiff:
Amerivape, Inc.
Defendant:
Kyle Kruger, Erik Hutchinson and Ameravape Technologies Inc
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1114
Hutchinson v. Strategic Security Corp. et al
as 1:2014cv06587
Plaintiff:
Veronica Hutchinson
Defendant:
Joseph Sordi and Strategic Security Corp.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1938 Fair Labor Standards Act
861 Eastern Parkway LLC v. Hutchinson
as 1:2014cv05856
Plaintiff:
861 Eastern Parkway LLC
Defendant:
Antoinette Hutchinson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Morgan v. Baird et al
as 1:2014cv07921
Plaintiff:
Johnny Morgan
Defendant:
Maureen P. Baird, Michael Ward, E. Green and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Akassy v. The New York Daily News et al
as 1:2014cv06352
Plaintiff:
Hugues-Denver Akassy
Defendant:
The New York Daily News, Shayna Jacobs, Melissa Grace and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hutchinson v. Colvin
as 6:2014cv00787
Plaintiff:
Jody Hutchinson
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Henderson v. Toole, et al
as 9:2014cv00784
Plaintiff:
Keith Henderson
Defendant:
Bishoplny, Bavan Fedenfield, Judge Bowen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
