Cases 41 - 50 of 53
Williams v. Kim et al
as 2:2012cv01900
Defendant:
I. Baca, James Cox, Angelique Gray and others
Plaintiff:
Albert Leon Williams
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Peterson v. Baca et al
as 3:2012cv00552
Respondent:
I. Baca and Nevada, State Of
Petitioner:
Stanley T. Peterson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Williams v. Baca et al
as 3:2012cv00503
Respondent:
I. Baca and Nevada Attorney General
Petitioner:
Christopher G. Williams
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Reginald Howard v. Howard Skolnik, et al
as 12-16937
Plaintiff - Appellant:
REGINALD CLARENCE HOWARD
Defendant - Appellee:
HOWARD SKOLNIK, Director (NDOC), DWIGHT NEVEN, Warden, I. BACA and others
Perinn, v. City of Commerce City, State of Colorado, et al.,
as 1:2012cv01172
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Perinn
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, State of Colorado, Phillip (I) Baca, Phillip Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perinn v. City of Commerce City, Colorado et al
as 1:2011cv01892
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Perinn
Defendant:
City of Commerce City, Colorado , Phillip (I) Baca, Phillip Baca and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Baca v. Ewing et al
as 2:2011cv00883
Plaintiff:
Tobias I Baca
Defendant:
Robert N Ewing and Fremont, Industrial Indemnity, and Cambridge
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2009cv02970
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tobias Baca v. Robert Ewing, et al
as 09-16491
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TOBIAS I. BACA, AKA Tobias Baca
Defendant - Appellee:
ROBERT N. EWING and FREMONT I.I. CAMBRIDGE, Attn: R. Lundmark
Baca v. Ewing, et al
as 2:2009cv00687
Plaintiff:
Tobias I Baca
Defendant:
Robert NL. Ewing, Fremont I.I. and Cambridge
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
