Cases 41 - 50 of 4,612
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10800
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Murphy v. Prescott et al
as 3:2024cv30042
Plaintiff:
Daniel J Murphy
Defendant:
Seon Prescott, Schneider National Carriers, Inc. and Schneider Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal
Mitchell v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10758
Plaintiff:
Trisha Amber Bailey Mitchell
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration and Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Foster Grant v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10700
Plaintiff:
Janice Sharon Foster Grant
Defendant:
Martin J O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Breslin v. O'Malley
as 1:2024cv10676
Plaintiff:
Ellen Fox Breslin
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2024cv10675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
McLintock v. Pomawit
as 3:2024cv30038
Plaintiff:
Robert J. McLintock
Defendant:
Poomjal Pomawit
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343 Violation of Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv10675
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Duarte v. N.C.S.O et al
as 1:2024cv10643
Plaintiff:
Eric J Duarte
Defendant:
N.C.S.O, Sheriff Patrick W. McDermott, Superintendent Danielle Frane and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mattes v. O'Malley, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration
as 1:2024cv10640
Plaintiff:
Devra Mattes
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
