Cases 41 - 50 of 595
Smith et al v. Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2013at01236
Plaintiff:
Corey Lamar Smith , Dion Barnett , Christopher Garner and others
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Jeffrey A. Beard, Paul D. Brazelton and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1343
Luis Armentero v. N. Lopez, et al
as 13-16901
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LUIS LORENZO ARMENTERO
Defendant - Appellee:
N. LOPEZ, JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden and K. J. ALLEN
Melvin Wishum et al v. State of California et al
as 2:2013cv06255
Defendant:
P D Brazelton, Edmund G Brown, Jr, California Correctional Health Care Services and others
Plaintiff:
Chrystal Tyler and Melvin Wishum
Carl Love v. James Hartley
as 13-16515
Petitioner - Appellant:
CARL R. LOVE
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden
Hartley v. Warren, City of et al
as 2:2013cv13120
Defendant:
Warren, City of and James R. Fouts
Plaintiff:
James P. Hartley
Jackson et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2013at00457
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson , LEONARD M LUJAN , MARCUS JACKSON and others
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Jackson et al v. State of California et al
as 1:2013cv01055
Plaintiff:
Arthur Duane Jackson , Leonard M. Lujan , Marcus Jackson and others
Defendant:
State of California, Edmund G. Brown, Jr., California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pablo Chavez v. James Hartley
as 13-16252
Petitioner - Appellant:
PABLO MENDOZA CHAVEZ
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden
Mendez v. Hartley
as 1:2013cv00914
Petitioner:
Ronald J. Mendez
Respondent:
James D. Hartley
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Jesse Hill v. James Hartley
as 13-16229
Petitioner - Appellant:
JESSE HILL
Respondent - Appellee:
JAMES D. HARTLEY, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
