Cases 41 - 50 of 120
Edwards v. Fort Worth OPC
as 4:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
Ruben James Edwards, Jr
Defendant:
Fort Worth, OPC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Edwards et al v. Reynolds et al
as 1:2016cv00052
Plaintiff:
James Edwards and Jewana L Smith
Defendant:
Jolynn Reynolds, Carol Karachiwala, FNU Trevino and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2016cv00020
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Age)
Farrington et al v. Newmar Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv00007
Plaintiff:
James Edward Farrington and Roberta Jacobs Farrington
Defendant:
Newmar Corporation, Holiday World of Katy, LLC and Bank of America, NA
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301
Adeyemi et al v. Maxum Petroleum Operating Company et al
as 7:2016cv00002
Plaintiff:
Taiwo Ayorinde, Jimoh Adeyemi, Adeniyi Akinwale and others
Defendant:
Maxum Petroleum Operating Company and Pilot Thomas Logistics, LLC
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Denial of Overtime Compensation
Woods v. EEE Enterprises, Ltd.,et al
as 3:2015cv00174
Plaintiff:
Daniel Woods and Richard Moffett
Defendant:
EEE Enterprises, Ltd., EEE Alvin, Ltd., Triple E-GP, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Carinado-Cox v. Dallas County Sheriff Office et al
as 3:2015cv01123
Plaintiff:
James Edward Carinado-Cox
Defendant:
Dallas County Sheriff Office, Lupe Valdez, NFN Jacobs and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lewis v. Stephens
as 4:2015cv00850
Petitioner:
James Edward Lewis
Respondent:
William Stephens
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2015cv00905
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681
McCutcheon v. Staples, Inc.
as 3:2015cv00365
Plaintiff:
James Edward McCutcheon
Defendant:
Staples, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
