Cases 41 - 50 of 226
Brikman et al v. Yehoshua et al
as 3:2021mc80272
Plaintiff:
Mayer Chaim Brikman, Rivkah Brikman and Joseph B. Wolhendler
Defendant:
Hecht S. Yehoshua, John Does 1-10 and Jane Does 1-10
Petitioner:
Twitter Inc.
(PC) Pavao v. Unknown
as 2:2021cv02082
Plaintiff:
Enrico Pavao
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-20 and Unknown
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Pavao v. John and Jane Doe 1-20
as 1:2021cv01635
Plaintiff:
Enrico Pavao
Defendant:
John and Jane Doe 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Doe 1 et al v. County of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2021cv08412
Plaintiff:
Jane Doe 1 and Jane Doe 2
Defendant:
County of Los Angeles and DOES 2 through 40
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
M.E.O.W.I.E. Foundation Inc. v. Alphabet, Inc.
as 5:2021cv07421
Plaintiff:
M.E.O.W.I.E. Foundation Inc. doing business as Beach Broadcast and Carrol Hall
Defendant:
Alphabet Inc., Google LLC doing business as YouTube, XXVI Holdings Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Merch Traffic, LLC v. John Does 1-100 et al
as 3:2021cv01452
Plaintiff:
Merch Traffic, LLC
Defendant:
John Does 1-100, Jane Does 1-100 and XYZ Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1051 Trademark Infringement
Jones v. Doe et al
as 3:2021cv01028
Defendant:
Warden, John and Jane Doe 1-50 and John and/or Jane Doe
Plaintiff:
Gerald Jones
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
MCPARLAND v. DELI WORKS et al
as 3:2021cv01035
3Rd Party Plaintiff:
DELI WORKS
Defendant:
JOHN DOE 1-10, JANE DOE 1-10 and JOHN DOE CORP. 1-10
Plaintiff:
Kyle Mcparland
3Rd Party Defendant:
Juul Labs Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2021cv01103
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Barth v. Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc et al
as 5:2020cv09288
Defendant:
Longino Ranch, Inc., Mabry Carlton Ranch, Inc, Eric Sutton and others
Plaintiff:
John S Barth and John Barth
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1964
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
