Cases 41 - 50 of 365
Stilwell v. Rubenstein et al
as 1:2017cv00164
Plaintiff:
Michael Scott Stilwell
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, John Doe, Lance Yardley and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hatcher v. Rubenstein et al
as 2:2017cv02054
Plaintiff:
Frederico Hatcher
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein, C. J. Ryder and David Ballard
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Langley v. Huntington WV Police Dept (HPD) (Arresting Officer) et al
as 3:2017cv03520
Plaintiff:
James Albert Langley
Defendant:
Huntington WV Police Dept (HPD) (Arresting Officer), Western Regional Jail (WRJ) (C.O. Michael York), Prime Care Medical Inc. (Nurse Jolaina) and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Stover v. Jim Lively Insurance, Inc., et al
as 2:2017cv03346
Plaintiff:
Jerry Stover
Defendant:
Jim Lively Insurance, Inc. and American Bankers Insurance Company of Florida
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 4053
Murray v. Ballard et al
as 2:2017cv03261
Plaintiff:
Garland Murray
Defendant:
David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein, Mitchel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Lucas v. Ballard et al
as 2:2017cv03144
Plaintiff:
James A. Lucas
Defendant:
David Ballard, Jim Rubenstein and Jeff Sandy
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bowling et al v. Boston Scientific Corporation
as 2:2017cv01467
Plaintiff:
Deborah Bowling and Jim Bowling
Defendant:
Boston Scientific Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Starkey et al v. Skana Aluminum Company et al
as 1:2017cv00032
Plaintiff:
Jeffrey N. Starkey and Lela F. Starkey
Defendant:
Skana Aluminum Company , Mary Eggett , Jim Goad and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Morris v. Rubenstein et al
as 3:2017cv01370
Plaintiff:
Jason Scott Morris
Defendant:
Jim Rubenstein and Janet Pettey
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harper v. Dillon et al
as 2:2013cv25077
Plaintiff:
Cedeal Harper
Defendant:
Kathy Dillon, David Ballard, Ralph Terry and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
