Cases 41 - 50 of 145
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2018cv02313
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329
Boquete et al v. Sky Satellite, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv21909
Plaintiff:
Jose Boquete , Jorge Abel Garcia , Angel Sauri and others
Defendant:
Sky Satellite, Inc. , Neldo Dominguez and Lucas Zucchi
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Jorge Garcia Herrarte v. Jefferson Sessions, III
as 18-71356
Petitioner:
JORGE DAVID GARCIA HERRARTE, AKA Jorge David Garcia
Respondent:
JEFFERSON B. SESSIONS III, Attorney General
Areco et al v. ATC Realty Fifteen, Inc. et al
as 1:2018cv02416
Plaintiff:
Hector Jorge Areco , Veronica Balbiani , Sonia Maricel Baravalle and others
Defendant:
ATC Realty Fifteen, Inc , S&P Global, Inc., Lifetrade Management Company, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Cruz Sanchez et al v. Rainbow Umbrella, LLC et al
as 1:2017cv09065
Plaintiff:
Alfredo Cruz Sanchez , Antonio Miguel Jimenez , David Texis Tecuapacho and others
Defendant:
Rainbow Umbrella, LLC, Peter Schatzberg and Todd Millman
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Jorge Pacifico Garcia v. BMW of North America, LLC et al
as 3:2017cv02321
Plaintiff:
Jorge Pacifico Garcia
Respondent:
BMW of North America LLC , BMW of Riverside and does
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Garcia v. United States of America
as 1:2017cv01062
Petitioner:
Jorge Joaquin Garcia
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
v. Treaty Transfer
as 3:2017mc00274
In Re:
Uriel Alejandrez Aguilar, Miguel Amador Guillen, Ramiro Bustos Ortuno and others
Defendant:
Treaty Transfer
Jorge Acevedo Garcia v. Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC
as 2:2017cv03598
Defendant:
Debt Recovery Solutions, LLC
Plaintiff:
Jorge Acevedo Garcia
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 0227 Violation of Telephone Consumer Protection Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
