Cases 41 - 50 of 51
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2011cv05487
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Holmberg v. Vail et al
as 3:2011cv05449
Plaintiff:
Michael Holmberg
Defendant:
Eldon Vail, Dan Pacholke, Patrick Glebe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Werschler et al v. State of Washington et al
as 2:2011cv00213
Plaintiff:
William P Werschler, Jr , Pamela Jo Schell Werschler , Spokane Dermatology Clinic PS and others
Defendant:
State of Washington , Dwight Correll , Jane Doe Correll and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dismuke v. The Boeing Company
as 2:2011cv00264
Plaintiff:
Manuel Dismuke
Defendant:
The Boeing Company and John and Jane Does, 1-5
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Jones v. Wells et al
as 2:2010cv00952
Plaintiff:
Jerrel Jones
Defendant:
Gregory Wells, Tanith Rogers, Morse and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Petersen v. Bolter et al
as 2:2009cv01164
Plaintiff:
Bonnie M Petersen
Defendant:
Rory Bolter, Jane Doe Bolter, Julie A Jamison and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
O'Neil v. Peak et al
as 2:2008cv01041
Plaintiff:
Sherri O'Neil
Defendant:
Robert Morris Peak, Courtiff Inc, Rori Enterprises Inc and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Summers v. Polizzi et al
as 3:2008cv05346
Plaintiff:
Shannon Summers
Defendant:
Frank A. Polizzi, Rolf Schumann, Conner Daily and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Luchtel v. Hagemann et al
as 2:2007cv01448
Plaintiff:
Karey R Luchtel
Defendant:
Clark Hagemann, Clark Hagemann, Thomas Hanley and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Walls v. Pierce County Jail et al
as 3:2007cv05153
Plaintiff:
Hillary Walls
Defendant:
Pierce County Jail, Chief of Corrections, Medical Director and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
