Cases 41 - 50 of 85
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2012cv00533
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv00396
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Tomlinson v. Cothran et al
as 3:2012cv00835
Plaintiff:
Jennie R. Tomlinson
Defendant:
James Cothran and Apex Carriers, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Cole v. State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2012cv00332
Plaintiff:
Robert Earl Cole
Defendant:
State of Tennessee, Charles Traughber, Yusef A. Hakeem and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Al-Amin v. Colson et al
as 3:2012cv00141
Plaintiff:
Shakur Ali Abdullah Al-Amin
Defendant:
f/n/u Colson, Sandy Hall, f/n/u Lewis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC.
as 2:2011cv02948
Defendant:
ENCORE CAPITAL GROUP, INC., MIDLAND FUNDING,LLC, MIDLAND CREDIT MANAGEMENT,INC. and others
Plaintiff:
JENNY BROWN
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Duvall et al v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011mc00023
Plaintiff:
Randy J Duvall and Beverly Warren
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield and others
Duvall et al v. The State of Tennessee et al
as 3:2011cv00512
Plaintiff:
Randy J Duvall and Beverly Warren
Defendant:
The State of Tennessee, Tennessee Department of Corrections, Derrick D Schofield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wolfe et al v. Alexander et al
as 3:2011cv00751
Plaintiff:
Tony Wolfe, Robert Barnes, Robert Davis and others
Defendant:
Paul Alexander, Monique Taylor, Debra Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Teasley v. Sehorn et al
as 3:2011cv00528
Plaintiff:
Ron Teasley
Defendant:
David Sehorn, Reuben Hodge, Richard Carter and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
