Cases 41 - 50 of 80
Prouty v. Johnson et al
as 0:2021cv02438
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
Nancy Johnson, Jodi Harpstead, Steve Sajdak and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. State of Minnesota et al
as 0:2021cv02437
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
State of Minnesota, All current DHS-MSOP employees, Jodi Harpstead and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Urbanek v. Harpstead
as 0:2021cv02352
Petitioner:
Edward E. Urbanek
Respondent:
Jodi Harpstead
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02253
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Erok Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02251
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Eric Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv02252
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Jodie Harpstead, St. Louis County Court, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Prouty v. Miles et al
as 0:2021cv02179
Plaintiff:
Darrell Dean Prouty
Defendant:
David Miles, Jeremy Wouri, Sue Swansen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. St. Louis County District Court et al
as 0:2021cv02137
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
St. Louis County District Court, Erok Skon, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
O'Donnell v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv02099
Plaintiff:
Mikey J. O'Donnell
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, St. Louis County & Court, State of Minnesota and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daywitt et al v. Harpstead et al
as 0:2021cv01848
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Daywitt, Kenneth Parks, Nicholas Luhmann and others
Defendant:
Jodi Harpstead, Nancy Johnston, Kathryn Schesso and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
