Cases 41 - 50 of 471
Smith v. Pearl River County et al
as 1:2022cv00032
Plaintiff:
Rodney Smith
Defendant:
Pearl River County, Joe Garcia, Daniel Quave and others
Interested Party:
Probation Gulfport and Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitaker v. Montgomery et al
as 1:2022cv00023
Plaintiff:
Kimiko Whitaker
Defendant:
Jociellia Roshay Montgomery and Joe Stanley Cane
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Williams v. Hubbard et al
as 1:2022cv00026
Plaintiff:
Billy Joe Williams
Defendant:
Warren Hubbard, Troy Peterson and Terri Robertson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2021cv00190
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Drake v. Mercedes Benz USA, LLC. et al
as 3:2021cv00251
Plaintiff:
Eric Drake and Eric *DO NOT FILE* Drake
Defendant:
Mercedes Benz USA, LLC., Best Buy Co., Inc., Corie Barry and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Patmon et al v. Tinree LLC et al
as 1:2021cv00174
Plaintiff:
Louise Patmon, Ricky Patmon and April Griffin
Defendant:
Tinree LLC, James E. Brooks, Kevin Casteel and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Dillon v. Central Intelligence Agency et al
as 1:2021cv00382
Plaintiff:
Jerrad Dillon
Defendant:
Central Intelligence Agency, Joe Biden and Donald Trump
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Carr et al v. Government Employees Insurance Company
as 3:2021cv00222
Plaintiff:
Latoya Carr and Joe Draper, Jr.
Defendant:
Government Employees Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pino v. Woodall et al
as 1:2021cv00316
Plaintiff:
Joe Pino
Defendant:
R. Woodall and N. Stevenson
Interested Party:
Pro Se Department
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Fondren v. Looney et al
as 1:2021cv00152
Plaintiff:
Jennifer Fondren
Defendant:
Jennifer Looney and Joe Almeda
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
