Cases 41 - 50 of 6,224
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. John Doe
as 3:2024cv00537
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 3:2024cv00536
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 0101 Copyright Infringement
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC v. Doe
as 2:2024cv02281
Plaintiff:
Strike 3 Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
John Doe
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Cormia v. Phillips et al
as 3:2024cv00517
Plaintiff:
Dolwin D. Cormia
Defendant:
Amber L. Phillips and John Doe #1
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Dowlen v. The City of Springfield, Tennessee et al
as 3:2024cv00522
Plaintiff:
Kierra Lachelle Dowlen
Defendant:
The City of Springfield, Tennessee and John Does 1-7
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00523
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Zimmer v. Rutherford County et al
as 3:2024cv00525
Plaintiff:
Brevan Zimmer
Defendant:
Rutherford County and Dr. John Daniel Rudd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McMahan et al v. Olin Corporation et al (JRG1)
as 1:2024cv00096
Defendant:
Olin Corporation, Lonza Walkersville, Inc., Olin Chlor Alkali Products and others
Plaintiff:
LaMotta McMahan, Mauricio Acevedo, Marilyn B. Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Phillips v. Marion County Sherriff's Department et al
as 1:2024cv00090
Plaintiff:
Bryan R. Phillips
Defendant:
Marion County Sherriff's Department, John Doe #1, John Doe #2 and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Cooper v. Dunn et al
as 3:2024cv00188
Plaintiff:
Erik Cooper
Defendant:
James Bruce Dunn, Ronald Crockett Newcomb, William Brownlow Marsh and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
