Cases 41 - 50 of 55
ROBERTS v. DOES 1 - 4 et al
as 2:2013cv00240
Plaintiff:
KEVIN ROBERTS
Defendant:
JOHN DOES 1 - 4, JANE DOE, REGGIE LITTLEFIELD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
COTE et al v. CUMBERLAND COUNTY et al
as 2:2013cv00226
Plaintiff:
BRIAN COTE
Defendant:
CUMBERLAND COUNTY, CUMBERLAND COUNTY JAIL, KEVIN JOYCE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WIDI v. MCNEIL et al
as 2:2012cv00188
Plaintiff:
DAVID J WIDI, JR
Defendant:
PAUL MCNEIL, STEPHEN E HICKEY, JR, CHRISTOPHER J DURKIN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
ERICSON v. MAGNUSSON et al
as 2:2012cv00178
Plaintiff:
ERIC ERICSON
Defendant:
MARTIN MAGNUSSON, JOSEPH PONTE, PATRICIA BARNHART and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
MURTAGH, MD v. ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER et al
as 2:2012cv00160
Plaintiff:
JAMES MURTAGH, MD
Defendant:
ST MARY'S REGIONAL HEALTH CENTER, ST MARY'S HEALTH SYSTEM, IRA SHAPIRO, MD and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv00326
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2010cv00336
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
BABCOCK v. PENOBSCOT COUNTY et al
as 1:2010cv00093
Plaintiff:
DANIEL BABCOCK
Defendant:
PENOBSCOT COUNTY , GLEN ROSS and JOHN DOES 1-6
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
MURPHY v. BUXTON, TOWN OF et al
as 1:2009cv00061
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN MURPHY
Defendant:
BUXTON, TOWN OF, DANIEL COLLOMY, LINDA W PULSONI and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
MURPHY v. MAINE, STATE OF et al
as 1:2009cv00056
Plaintiff:
CAROL ANN MURPHY
Defendant:
MAINE, STATE OF, JOHN BALDACCI, G STEVEN ROWE and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
