Cases 41 - 50 of 130
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00147
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION v. STROUD et al.
as 1:2022cv00390
Plaintiff:
BA-PAKAL LUMA NATION and Black Feather and Coosa Nation, a sister Nation and Juridical Personality
Defendant:
CHIEF TRAVIS STROUD, OFFICER DEVON WILLIAMSON, LIEUTENANT BRENT J. MACFARLAND and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Whitcher v. Stein et al
as 5:2022hc02084
Petitioner:
Aulden Mathew Whitcher
Respondent:
Josh Stein, Jon David, John Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Sherrod v. Stein et al
as 5:2022ct03157
Plaintiff:
Marion L. Sherrod
Defendant:
Josh E. Stein and Erik A. Hooks
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Massey v. Funderburk et al
as 5:2022ct03096
Plaintiff:
Quamaine Lee Massey
Defendant:
Amy Funderburk, Josh Stein and Daniel O'Brien
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
RICE v. ROGERS
as 1:2022cv00335
Plaintiff:
NATHANIEL DANTE RICE
Defendant:
DANNY ROGERS, ARAMARK, INC., WELL PATH, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Means v. Higdon et al
as 5:2021ct03267
Plaintiff:
Charles Antonio Means
Defendant:
Bobby Higdon, Josh Stein, Stanley L. Allen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Ridgeway v. Stein et al
as 5:2021hc02179
Petitioner:
Avenger Don Ridgeway
Respondent:
Josh Stein and Mr. Peritt
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Newell v. Stein et al
as 5:2021ct03226
Plaintiff:
Jonathan James Newell
Defendant:
Josh Stein, Todd Ishee, Shanticia Hawkins and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
James v. Cooper et al
as 5:2021ct03173
Defendant:
State of North Carolina, Roy Cooper and Josh Stein
Plaintiff:
Harry Sharod James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
